The debate about short-term rentals, including sites like Airbnb, Flipkey, VRBO, and Craigslist continues in San Diego. The San Diego City Council Smart Growth & Land Use Committee held a public hearing on April 22nd that was attended by hundreds and will be continued in a hearing to be held on May 29th. To date, four council members have issued memos on the issue (click links for full memos):
While there are a broad number of issues that have been raised, there are also some very major points that nearly everyone agrees on. These basic points should be the baseline for any proposed rules or regulations. They include:
- Everyone should pay the hotel taxes due
- Anyone renting out a property or a part of a property is responsible for timely and full payment of the San Diego hotel taxes – for most, that is a transient occupancy tax of 10.5% and a tourism marketing district assessment of .55%. (For more details on the taxes click here.) These taxes are not being debated although the City Treasurer could do more to improve the payment system including acceptance of credit card payments, a payment profile system to save account information and history, and acceptance of zero due filings. Additional staff for the Treasurer’s office to collect back taxes would likely pay for itself many times over in addressing current non-compliant properties.
- Owner-occupied properties should be allowed to host guests
- The horror stories of late-night parties, loud noise, and heaps of trash no doubt reflect reality in some instances. These types of issues are far more likely to occur in a non-owner occupied property. I have heard very few people that want to prevent a widower from renting a room in their house, or a young couple trying to pay bills renting a spare bedroom. Home owners should not be curtailed in their ability to rent space on their own property. There do not seem to be many San Diegans that would agree with the City Attorney prosecuting a retiree in Burlingame for renting rooms in her own home. (Other than perhaps her private investigator neighbors.)
- Enforcement of existing nuisance laws and fines for bad actors
- Late-night noise, property damage, trespassing, and other issues have existing laws on the books. These should be enforced and property owners held responsible for the behavior taking place on their property. Additionally, most parties support fines for bad actors on an escalating scale.
Hopefully the city council will take these common ground, and common sense, items as a starting point for any proposals put forward. Other issues remain and will likely be contentious but with very strong support across the board for the above items there is no need to muddy the conversation with issues that are not being debated.